This is solved, I was being dumb. Please see second EDIT below
This isn’t really language specific, but if it helps I’m using Python. I can get the parameters just fine with the Traitlets module, but I’m still a novice really and figuring out which patterns to use is challenging.
Say you have a bunch of command line parameters. Some are booleans, where their presence means True, absence means False. Other parameters must accept one text string, and others can be used multiple times to build a list of strings.
It feels inefficient/wrong to use a bunch of IF/THEN/ELSE statements to decide what to do with the parameters, and prone to edge case errors. Is there a pattern that would invoke the correct method based on the combination of input parameters?
Examples:
app thing --dry-run --create --name=newname01 --name=newname02 --verbose
app thing --create --name=newname01 --name=newname02 --name=newname03
app job --cancel -i 01 -i 02 -i 03
EDIT: Via the Traitlets module, I get those arguments parsed and accessible as self.argname, so getting them into my app is working great. It’s just deciding what to do with them that is confusing me.
Thank you, sorry for my noobness.
EDIT2: I think I understand where I’m going wrong:
I’m creating subcommands based on objects, not actions. i.e. appname thing --action should really be appname action --thing. Once things are divided up into actions, assigning things to those actions will be much, much easier and straightforward.
Sorry for a confusing and fairly pointless post :(
Seems like a for statement and a case statement could work.
Detect numargs
For a = 0 to numargs
Get core command on arg a (probably read until you hit an equals sign or a space), trim and lcase
Select Case core command
Case “thing”
Do stuff
Case “–name” Get part after equals and do stuff
Case “-i” Get next arg and increment a
End select
I was doing it wrong. I was trying to do
appname thing --actionwhen I should have been doingappname action --thing. Thank you for commenting, I’m sorry to waste your time.No worries, it was fun trying to figure out a solution to the problem regardless.