i’ve just seen a comment in a post, in this very community, saying people trust signal because of missinformation (from what i could undertand).
if this is true, then i have a few questions:
-what menssaging app should i use for secure communications? i need an app that balances simplicity and security.
-how to explain it to my friends who use signal because i recomended?
-what this means for other apps in general?
The point is this statement is pointless because they exist anyway.
And signal can decide to break them if they want. You think it’s pointless, but yet you’re spending energy fighting a point that is pointless to you?
Was providing additional information because other people could read what you wrote and misunderstand it as being blocked via technical means rather than merely unsupported. What is with people in this community being upset when people challenge their misinformation??? It’s a really alarming attribute for something like a privacy community tbh
I’m not upset. So maybe a good question to ask yourself?
And I didn’t give misinformation. Signal doesn’t allow it. Yes, they exist, and can break at any time.
I personally have Signal. I use Matrix more, but in wouldn’t turn away Signal.
OP asked for information on what gives people pause about Signal. I have gave it. Where is my misinformation? I’d like to know so I can learn as well.
What you personally view as pointless, matters to some people.
That’s for each to decide. If this is a community focused on privacy, as you said, shouldn’t we give everyone the information they asked and not make decisions on what is or is not pointless to them?
It is a fact that Signal is a centralized service. They do not allow federation. They do not allow third party clients. They could decide in the future to turn people accounts off for using third party clients.
I have lived through this numerous times. I don’t trust a centralized service as much as one I can run myself. That’s for each to decide.