• Senal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Perhaps the argument that it isn’t possible to assess merit for a job position is so far outside the realms of reason that asking for clarification is the only way to formulate an answer.

    But if you want a simple, quotable answer for the obvious question as it is written, here you go:

    • Asses the criteria for which a job would be considered to be successfully performed.
    • Check if historical evidence/experience/current skill/expected future growth gives indication that the candidate could meet or exceed those criteria.
    • Rank the candidates, based on how well they match to the success criteria.
    • ???
    • Profit?

    It’s tremendously disappointing to see people act like assessing fitness for a role isn’t a thing that has been going on since the dawn of civilisation.

    Get a grip.


    Now, if you want argue that this isn’t how things are currently done ? I’m right there with you.

    The system is a shambolic remnant of what it should be ? couldn’t agree more.

    A lot of it is probably by design ? sure, i’m down for that perspective.

    But “It isn’t possible to assess merit for a job role”, is a troll at best or extreme ignorance at worst.

    If people weren’t asking “are you sure that this is what you meant?” i’d be worried for the state of basic reasoning.