• NostraDavid
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    OK, can you give me the definition of violence that you use? Because the common one is:

    behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.

    You remind me of my Christian parents who redefined “religious” to mean “following the laws of the Bible”, which they claim they don’t because they follow Jesus instead, so my Christian parents now claim not to be religious, even though the common definition is “relating to or believing in a religion.” - simple as that. It feels really silly to do that. Cult-ish, even.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What displayed here is a form of economic violence. It looks like you asked for a definition of violence instead of searching for types of violence.

      • NostraDavid
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It looks like you asked for a definition of violence instead of searching for types of violence.

        Yes, because if you have a word that has a definition, and you put a modifier in front of it to specify something, you can’t have that thing becomes something completely different.

        Let’s assume my point for a second, for the sake of argument (yes, yes, I know you don’t agree), and violence is physical only.

        That means that if you add a modifier in front of it, it doesn’t make sense to have that specified violence suddenly not be physical.

        That just doesn’t make any logical sense.