• @KickMe
    link
    1
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • raven [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I don’t think being anti white supremacy and homophobia is shitty or controversial. Why would an Internet company write an article about something that affects the biggest sector of the Internet, social media? 🤔
      “No they should stay in their lane and only talk about, I don’t know, CSS or something.” I don’t buy it.

      • @KickMe
        link
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • raven [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          …the article you linked me? The topic of this discussion?

          It shouldn’t be controversial to anyone. The suggestions given there are pretty mild. Regardless, justice is not the absence of conflict. Sorry the article made you upset but that doesn’t make it wrong.

          • @KickMe
            link
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • raven [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              The opinion:
              “Homophobia and white supremacy are bad and should be combated”

              It’s interesting that you think firefox is being “controversial” when their CEO writes a couple paragraphs about combating hate speech online, but brave isn’t when their CEO sends money to hate organizations. 🤔

              If the user share of Firefox falls too low websites will stop supporting it (which is already happening), we will have given google the internet. Everything that is not Firefox is based on Chrome.