• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2210 months ago

    While I agree with your sentiment, ~2/3rds of it according to the article isn’t being given to them but being available in loans. So the article should say $5.5 given away, and $10 billion made avaliable to pay back.

    • @zephyreks
      link
      210 months ago

      Loans are costs too. It’s tying up capital that could be used elsewhere

      • RaivoKulli
        link
        fedilink
        610 months ago

        It’s more like investment, especially if it saves jobs. It can be a win-win. Companies have it easier time switching to EV manufacturing, which helps those companies and the environment. Manufacturing jobs are saved, both giving a living to a lot of people and helping communities and saving on benefit payments.

        Could of course backfire or go to shit but investments like this from states seem like a very wise move imo.

          • RaivoKulli
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            I wouldn’t exactly be surprised if that happens but I’m not pessimistic enough to think it will hah. I’d imagine plenty of them will actually use the money for EV transition since that really is the direction things are going anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        It’s tying up capital that could be used elsewhere

        I’m not sure that’s the case when you’re the government and can and do print money. Not every rule of finance applies to the entity that gives credibility to the currency in the first place. This is also why the concept of governmental debt is much less meaningful than the concept of individual debt.

        • @zephyreks
          link
          510 months ago

          The government is limited in monetary policy by inflation.

          Of course, the Petrodollar doesn’t really have this problem, but it ends up exporting inflation around the world.