• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -51 year ago

        You say the math is written out, and then compare one overpaid person to the number of striking workers. Pretty dumb.

        And you’re the one that doesn’t understand cash or shareholders.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I do exactly the opposite of that, actually.

          You literally have as much time as you’d like to read and parse that post, and can even ask me questions if the words are too confusing.

          Hint:

          365x the average workers salary divided by 150,000 workers.

          This is suggesting robbing the CEO to pay Paul is not the slam dunk win people (including NIMBY Robert Reich) think it is.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                You’re the one who thinks that the CEO to worker pay ratio is literally only about the CEO. You also think that cash on hand can be freely distributed to workers if that’s what management wants. I’m not the idiot here. You are.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  If you mean something other than CEO to worker pay, perhaps you should articulate that. You still have not made any sense whatsoever.

                  Cash on hand can absolutely be spent in a wide variety of ways, be it M&A, disaster scenarios, or sudden changes to business structure. That’s one of the most significant purposes of cash on hand.

                  Have you ever worked in a senior position at a company? Ever run your own business?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -21 year ago

                    Everyone who is not an idiot knows that it’s about executive pay in general vs worker pay.

                    Way to not address the specific point I made about cash. But answer this instead: who owns the cash a company generates?