This should be illegal, companies should be forced to open-source games (or at least provide the code to people who bought it) if they decide to discontinue it, so people can preserve it on their own.

  • @Surreal
    link
    English
    3910 months ago

    If that man harnesses the power of LLM like Chat GPT, he can continue talking with his wife

    • recursive_recursion [they/them]A
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      hmm not sure if that would work as the model that he was using would be different from what’s available so he’d probably notice some differences which might cause a mix of uncanny valley and surrealism/suspension of disbelief where the two are noticably not the same

      plus using a chat-only model would be real tragic as it’s a significant downgrade from what they already had

      his story actually feels like a Romeo and Juliet situation

      • @Surreal
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        LLM is capable of role-playing, character.ai for example can get into the role of any character after being trained. The sound is just text-to-speech, character.ai already includes that, though if a realistic voice is desired, it would need to be generated by a more sophisticated method, which is already being done. Example: Neuro-sama, ElevenLabs

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Doesn’t even take a change of service provider to get there.

        Replika had what had very obviously become a virtual mate service too, until they decided “love” wasn’t part of their system anymore. Probably because it looked bad for investors, as happened for a lot of AI-based services people used for smut.

        So a bunch of lonely people had their “virtual companion” suddenly lobotomized, and there’s nothing they could do about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            It’s… complicated.

            At first the idea was it’d be training an actual “replica” of yourself, that could reflect your own personality. Then when they realized their was a demand for companionship they converted it into virtual friend. Then of course there was a demand for “more than friends”, and yeah, they made it possible to create a custom mate for a while.

            Then suddenly it became a problem for them to be seen as a light porn generator. Probably because investors don’t want to touch that, or maybe because of a terms of servce change with their AI service provider.

            At that point they started to censor lewd interactions and pretend replika was never supposed to be more than a friendly bot you can talk to. Which is, depending on how you interpret what services they proposed and how they advertized them until then, kind of a blatant lie.