Things have gotten better and progress has been made from times past, it just seems worse now because we have more access to information. We’ve come far, and have further to go!

  • No_
    14•9 months ago

    Mass producing shit at inhuman factories with deaths by the millions. I guess you’re not poor if you’re just dead.

    • no banana
      21•9 months ago

      Technically correct. A dead person is neither rich nor poor.

    • Guildo
      13•9 months ago

      Look at the statistics. I am not lying. You can complain, but that are facts.

      • Nobsi
        -8•9 months ago

        What statistics? The one the CCP made up? Over a quarter of chinese are still in extreme poverty and a huge amount of chinese still have an income of under 1500 yuan a month.
        Sure, they might have lifted some people out of poverty, but they also put them into poverty in the first place under mao. So celebrating this is kind of self congratulatory.

        • Guildo
          1•9 months ago

          You can google it. It takes just a few seconds. I think you can handle it… If I search it for you, you wouldn’t believe it.

            • Guildo
              3•9 months ago

              LOL!

              “Elsewhere in the region, Vietnam has also seen a dramatic fall in extreme poverty rates over a similar period. Another large country, India, had 22% of its population living below the international poverty line in 2011 (the most recent data available). Brazil has 4.4% of its people earning less than $1.90 a day.”

              How many people has the US lifted out of poverty? How many people has Britain lifted out of poverty? How many has any state in the EU lifted out of poverty? And france isn’t even mentioned in the article. Vietnam is btw. socialistic.

              • Nobsi
                -4•9 months ago

                The US didnt have to lift X people out of poverty because it never had this problem in the first place. The US didnt let millions die in famines. There is also no other country boasting about how many people they got to a survivable state since 1980.

                How well is your understanding of english? We already discussed what you think is a counterargument before you came up with it.

                The fact that you dont understand why i chose france shows that your understanding of these arguments and the underlying reasons are too high for you.

                Let me rephrase it for a 5 year old.
                France had royalty and many rich people but also many many poor people. Those lived under poverty. They then killed the royalty and reshaped france. Now france is better and those people were not in poverty anymore. Does this make sense to you?

                  • Nobsi
                    0•9 months ago

                    I am asking again. Do you understand english enough to follow what we are saying?
                    Because you just linked a statistic on poverty. A statistic that as you can see started at 25 (in a time where this data wasnt even tracked) and ended at 12.
                    Your heartwarming story about china and its 0.7 Percent is; let me bold this so you see the difference; extreme poverty. And again. Chinas poverty is directly in relation to policies made by the chinese ruling party.
                    Chona started at 98% and is still on a modest 14+

                    Great Britain in 2020 had a poverty rate (5.50 per day) of 0.7 percent.
                    China has 20 times that. Just editing that in here because later you compared britain to china.

                    I am asking again if you understand what i am writing. Because you made it very clear up to this point thst you do not understand.