foss

  • starman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Most of that stuff is MIT/Apache licensed unlike programs from GNU. Interesting.

    • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be cool if the GNU project sponsored a new updated ‘standard’ set of tools though.

      • dsemy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would they? The “old” tools work very well, are well known and are likely used in millions of scripts.

        The new tools will have more bugs, unfamiliar options and unexpected behavior (due to them being new), and the improvements current “modern” alternatives bring to the table are often very minor.

        • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d expect they’d ‘adopt’ the tools and redistribute them under the GPL, if they did.

    • Schmeckinger@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably because that’s basically the default license rust projects use and a lot of this stuff is made in rust.