cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/3658116

or maybe some other terminology would be better? lots of people get confused when you ask them to choose an instance, sometimes I think even the word “proxy”, “host”, or “hub” is simpler

the specific terms aren’t my point, just a discussion to see if we can come up with a better name

  • Die4EverOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    yea I understand, but I think the term “instance” confuses new users

    I would only use terms like “proxy” or “hub” if the instance actually had federation enabled, otherwise I would probably just call it a “server” or “host”

    The thing I like about proxy or hub is that they imply you can access the other content out there and the choice isn’t super important

    the point of this post is to reevaluate our terminology because it’s a huge source of confusion for new users, I don’t know what term is best but I’m pretty sure “instance” is not good

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      no offense, but ‘proxy’ and ‘hub’ are also technophobe-ambiguous. servers, however… is somewhat mainstream. all my ignorant staff understand the server concept.

      • marsokod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with you on proxy.

        For hub I am not sure, that sounds a bit more mainstream to me, with the caveat that English is not my mother tongue. That gives a nice image that an instance is basically an access hub to a whole universe of data.