@[email protected] to Lefty [email protected]English • 9 months agofair share?discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square541fedilinkarrow-up12.18Karrow-down177
arrow-up12.1Karrow-down1imagefair share?discuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to Lefty [email protected]English • 9 months agomessage-square541fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish36•9 months agoThe tax should be even higher. No one needs $100 billion.
minus-squareLurker123 [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish26•9 months agoGod the insanity of that wealth is hard to fathom. Nobody needs $100m, which is itself a totally insignificant amount compared to $1b… and we’re talking people with hundreds of billions :/
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•9 months agofor real. $400m is closer to $0 than it is to $1b
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•9 months agoHow do you handle a CEO owning stock worth that amount in the marketplace, then?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months agoThey don’t. No one can explain how a wealth tax work because it doesn’t work.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•9 months agoMy issue wasn’t with a wealth tax (even though I’m against it), but pulling some arbitrary wealth cap out of thin air opens a lot of questions that many people don’t consider the implications of.
The tax should be even higher. No one needs $100 billion.
No one needs $1 billion
God the insanity of that wealth is hard to fathom.
Nobody needs $100m, which is itself a totally insignificant amount compared to $1b… and we’re talking people with hundreds of billions :/
for real. $400m is closer to $0 than it is to $1b
deleted by creator
How do you handle a CEO owning stock worth that amount in the marketplace, then?
They don’t. No one can explain how a wealth tax work because it doesn’t work.
My issue wasn’t with a wealth tax (even though I’m against it), but pulling some arbitrary wealth cap out of thin air opens a lot of questions that many people don’t consider the implications of.
Removed by mod