Five to [email protected]English • 1 year agoSo Much for ‘Learn to Code’web.archive.orgexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up157arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up154arrow-down1external-linkSo Much for ‘Learn to Code’web.archive.orgFive to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square47fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareEm AdespotonlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoIndeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Technologies evolve. People coding today in COBOL or Fortran are few and far between (but very well compensated).
minus-squareRickRussell_CAlinkfedilinkEnglish11•edit-21 year ago Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Umm. Yes.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoYeah sure, i use Emacs to code. In evil mode. A lot of Emacs users use it to code. Why would you think otherwise?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•edit-21 year ago Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Sure. Why wouldn’t they?
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilink1•edit-21 year ago Indeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example? Not sure if that’s a serious question. Yes. They do. And many use it effectively. I use (neo)vim though because it works for me
Indeed. Do people still use emacs to code, for example?
Technologies evolve. People coding today in COBOL or Fortran are few and far between (but very well compensated).
Umm. Yes.
Yeah sure, i use Emacs to code. In evil mode. A lot of Emacs users use it to code. Why would you think otherwise?
No, all the cool kids use Vim.
Sure. Why wouldn’t they?
Hell yea we do use emacs!
Not sure if that’s a serious question. Yes. They do. And many use it effectively. I use (neo)vim though because it works for me