@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 months agoI'm probably going to get a lot of explanations in the commentslemmy.worldimagemessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up1743arrow-down151
arrow-up1692arrow-down1imageI'm probably going to get a lot of explanations in the commentslemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 months agomessage-square146fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•9 months agoI mean doesn’t that come from Java naming conventions? Which then makes sense that it continued on Android… but Why did it end up on FlatPack!?
minus-squareTechognitolinkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months agoI will speculate to say that maybe someone looked at the java/android way and thought let’s just copy that. It’s the most plausible answer I can think of, without doing any research whatsoever
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•9 months agoIt’s a nice way to get around naming collisions.
I mean doesn’t that come from Java naming conventions? Which then makes sense that it continued on Android… but Why did it end up on FlatPack!?
I will speculate to say that maybe someone looked at the java/android way and thought let’s just copy that.
It’s the most plausible answer I can think of, without doing any research whatsoever
It’s a nice way to get around naming collisions.
Well yeah that’s true