Grayox to [email protected] • 1 year agoHmmmmlemmy.mlimagemessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down1135
arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1imageHmmmmlemmy.mlGrayox to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square146fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•1 year agoThe Jews weren’t there first. The Canaanites were there first.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•1 year agoOf which the Israelites are believed to have branched out from/are descended from
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•1 year agoZionists are basing their irridentism on the Torah, and from what I’ve read, the Canaanites existed in the area before Abraham was given the land as a promised land.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink15•1 year agoSomething tells me that the Torah isn’t exactly a reliable historical source. The Cannanite - Israelite connection is suggested by modern achaelogical information which I take as a little more reliable.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•1 year agoGot any sources for that? Since I can’t seem to find anything that supports that claim outside of religious texts
The Jews weren’t there first. The Canaanites were there first.
Of which the Israelites are believed to have branched out from/are descended from
Zionists are basing their irridentism on the Torah, and from what I’ve read, the Canaanites existed in the area before Abraham was given the land as a promised land.
Something tells me that the Torah isn’t exactly a reliable historical source.
The Cannanite - Israelite connection is suggested by modern achaelogical information which I take as a little more reliable.
Depends which Zionist you ask but ok.
And then slaughtered all the other branches
Got any sources for that? Since I can’t seem to find anything that supports that claim outside of religious texts