• @vcmj
    link
    221 year ago

    I remember hearing a while back that Musk made an executive decision at Tesla to not use LIDAR. I thought: “That’s a stupid decision. At least invest in making it better if you think its not sufficient” and I had a quite negative view of his engineering abilities ever since. Seeing as a Tesla can be fooled by a projector these days, I’m willing to die on that hill. I will admit that he is an exceptional businessman, most people would piss away a fortune if given one, but an engineer he is not, not by a loooooooong way.

      • @vcmj
        link
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        True that, he did good on that front for a while though. He got too confident

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        He’s exchanging money for, adoration, power and control of a narrative. I think he wants to run for president someday

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          If he wants to run for US president, then there would have to be an amendment since he was not born in the US.

          • Hot Saucerman
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            As if silly little things like “The Law” or “The Constitution” matter to conservatives these days…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      I mean, you still need object detection and recognition with lidar, don’t want to stamp on the brakes for a leaf.
      And using only the primary sense of humans does kinda make sense.

      still think it’s tough call. Would be great if you don’t need it. And don’t know how expensive it would have been, especially at the start for all the people needing the hardware but not actually getting the use out of it.

      otoh the only really successfull company in the space - waymo - uses it, that seems like a really strong sign

      • @vcmj
        link
        101 year ago

        Yeah, in my mind I thought of it more as a “why not” in addition to vision. Like why make it only as capable as the humans its trying to replace when it can have even more data to work with? Probably would have been even more expensive though

    • BarqsHasBite
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Eventually camera based is all we’ll need. The question is how long that will take for the software. Lidar ain’t cheap and unlikely to become cheap.