@canpolatM to GitEnglish • 11 months agoConfusing git terminologyjvns.camessage-square5arrow-up110arrow-down11cross-posted to: programming
arrow-up19arrow-down1external-linkConfusing git terminologyjvns.ca@canpolatM to GitEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square5cross-posted to: programming
minus-square@aportlink6•edit-211 months agoPeople would be a lot less confused if they would read the official git book instead of trying to force their they through life googling errors and cheatsheets.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•11 months agoPeople just nuke a local git repo and reclone if something goes wrong. There isn’t even an attempt to understand anything.
minus-squareTechNom (nobody)linkEnglish1•11 months ago+1. Git is one of those projects that supply official, authoritative, comprehensive and easy-to-understand documentation.
People would be a lot less confused if they would read the official git book instead of trying to force their they through life googling errors and cheatsheets.
People just nuke a local git repo and reclone if something goes wrong. There isn’t even an attempt to understand anything.
Reading the manual? That’s cheating!
+1. Git is one of those projects that supply official, authoritative, comprehensive and easy-to-understand documentation.