• dudinax
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or, if instead of reducing emissions, we try to geo-engineer our way out of global warming, screw it up, and create a real snowball Earth.

    • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      As opposed to geo-engineering our way into global warming like we have been?

      “Oh no, don’t try anything! We might be too successful.”

      • dudinax
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Warming is bad, so cooling has to be good. Is that your logic?

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, I’m just pointing out the fallacy in your comment that carbon emissions aren’t geo-engineering or that reducing carbon emissions isn’t either. Also that any actually geo-engineered solution, as per your definition, is going to be far less effective than the literal centuries of concerted effort to destroy the environment.