• jasory
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Umm… No? The logical error you made was asserting the existence of an object. This specific object is highly improbable to exist, and since the purpose of your comment was to seem intelligent and witty it would have been better to assert the existence of a more probable object whose connection to neurological damage would be less obvious without specific knowledge.

    It’s really sad when the people you interact with are so stupid they can’t even insult properly.

    • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thats why I said it was a bad idea for you to replace your cups with lead, there, dumbass.

      Because safe drinking pewter exists, and only a moron would make a lead drinking mug.

      Im glad I could hold your hand and walk you slowly through such a mind numbingly simple sentence. Next time, should I get you some crayons? You can draw a picture to help you understand.

      • jasory
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Safe drinking pewter existences”

        I know dipshit, unlike you I know not to eat 2kg of tuna a day. Whom am I talking to Karen Wetterhahn ca. 1997?1 The fact that pewter can be lead-free has no effect on the insult because pewter is classically a lead alloy and is generally considered as such in common parlance.

        “Should I get you some crayons…you can draw a picture”

        What is this? Everyone in the military knows that Marines eat crayons, how come a witticist as yourself can’t even seem to rise to the level of people who score a 70 on a grade 8 test?

        1. That’s how you do a neurological damage insult, not making weak and cliche references, and then jerking yourself off over how intelligent you are when it’s pointed out.
          • jasory
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            So concerned about pewter /= lead and yet this is a rigourous proof to you?

            Sweetie, you’re not going to win any contest against me except in obesity.

            Stop thinking you’re so special in a non-euphemistic way.

              • jasory
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                This isn’t the mechanism of plumbism, but A+ for effort since we both know this was a Herculean task for you. Orators will recount the 11th labor of wildginger and the Lead Metaphors of Lemmy.