• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Because Stalin didn’t invade Poland and the Baltic states, right? And he didn’t sign agreements with hitler before the war?

      Oh oh let me guess, they were “saving them from Nazis”! Now where have I heard that before…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        The west constantly uses the memory of appeasement to justify its killings today but back when it was happening Stalin tried to start the war when Hitler could be easily crushed. It’s only after the west decided they would rather use the nazis to kill the communists than prevent the holocaust that deal was made.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          What are you even talking about? Hitler attacked the Soviets, not the other way around. And it was because they broke their agreement and took territory that they said they wouldn’t.

          Appeasement isn’t even relevant in this context, so not sure what you mean by that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              011 months ago

              In the context of WW2 appeasement refers to Britain and the rest of Europe giving pieces of Czechoslovakia to Germany. Not a deal between the Soviets and Germany to carve up Eastern Europe.

              It’s ok keep working on your English!