@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 months agoUS men are dying much earlier than women, as death 'gender gap' widens: Studymedicalxpress.comexternal-linkmessage-square239fedilinkarrow-up1586arrow-down113
arrow-up1573arrow-down1external-linkUS men are dying much earlier than women, as death 'gender gap' widens: Studymedicalxpress.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 months agomessage-square239fedilink
minus-squarecaronlinkfedilink20•11 months agoYes, but what about those women who have to lose their husbands and sons? They are the real victims.
minus-squarekaselinkfedilink-2•11 months agoYou’re not wrong that they matter too, but both things can be bad
minus-squarecaronlinkfedilink30•11 months agoI don’t know how many people have noticed, but I was being sarcastic.
minus-squarePraise IdlenesslinkfedilinkEnglish12•11 months agoThe fact that this has to be explained tho
minus-square520linkfedilink9•11 months agoLol it was a reference to how Hilary Clinton once said wives and daughters were the real victims of war.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•11 months agoHillary Clinton, 1998? Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.
minus-squareCosmic ClericlinkfedilinkEnglish0•11 months ago I don’t know how many people have noticed, but I was being sarcastic. Best to use /s when you are. Even italicising a point doesn’t seem to make it through the consumption to understanding; need to be more explicit here it seems.
Yes, but what about those women who have to lose their husbands and sons? They are the real victims.
…and not the dead guys?
You’re not wrong that they matter too, but both things can be bad
I don’t know how many people have noticed, but I was being sarcastic.
The fact that this has to be explained tho
Oh crap my bad XD
Lol it was a reference to how Hilary Clinton once said wives and daughters were the real victims of war.
Poe’s law my friend.
Hillary Clinton, 1998?
Best to use /s when you are.
Even italicising a point doesn’t seem to make it through the consumption to understanding; need to be more explicit here it seems.