• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1811 months ago

    How embarrassing must it be for both sides if no one is willing to go public?
    If it were something illegal, they wouldn’t be holding back. Unless the board is somehow complicit by default.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 months ago

      Yeah when I heard this, and after I read the available information, I was like did they walk in on him f****** a dog in his office or something? Like the secrecy around his dismissal is so total. But then all these people he has so much support within the company. Very confusing

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Haha, My speech to text has a built-in f*** stopper. Which I find funny, gives me a good chuckle

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -511 months ago

      The boards job is to deliver shareholder value. Ergo, it may or may not be something illegal, all ypu can guarantee is that they think that revealing information might lose shareholder value.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1811 months ago

        The board that fired him was that of the nonprofit, so they don’t answer to shareholders.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        They don’t have shareholders. Open AI is a nonprofit. So the job of the board is literally to do what is best for the organization, I can’t see how it could possibly be good for the organisation to fire the CEO and then point right refused to elaborators to the reason.

      • Optional
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        To be honest the shareholder value on a non-profit is, uh, lackluster.