• nous
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    On the flip side, why remove support if it is not causing major maintenance problems? I bet the code for these has not needed to be touched for a long time.

    • I Cast Fist
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Removing very old stuff might make it easier to change other things that are still used by other drivers. Let’s say that both 3dfx and Geforce FX (2003 cards) call the same functions. Let’s say that the function to display a texture has 2 different sets of code, one to deal with the older 3dfx, another for the geforce. If you no longer need to support the 3dfx, you can also remove the whole set of code it needed, possibly making things slightly faster for the rest, as it’ll no longer have to check for a 3dfx card. You can also add something you couldn’t before, due to the limitations of the “minimal” card expected

    • pan_troglodytes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      that’s true, it’s probably very stable - but more code increases the total size of the package delivered.

      • nous
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Drivers are optionally compiled in Linux, if they default to off then they are not built or distributed to end users. Or if they are compiled as external modules they can be put in optional packages that most don’t need to download.

        But yeah, eventually it can be good to remove old stuff. But ideally only after no one else is using it. Which isbwhy they leave things in for longer periods of time.