@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 10 months agoSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pubimagemessage-square262fedilinkarrow-up11.4Karrow-down138
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imageSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pub@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 10 months agomessage-square262fedilink
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilink27•10 months agoAnarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•10 months agoBut then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•10 months agoWhich is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.
minus-squareoce 🐆linkfedilink1•10 months agoIs it not possible for the people to all agree to respect the result of the majority vote even if they voted against the motion?
minus-squareNorgurlinkfedilink55•10 months agoOpen a GitHub repo with a hello world script and accept each and every commit
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink26•10 months agoThe same way, generally. Work on decentralized, open source software. It’s modern Mutual Aid.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink26•10 months agowork on decentralized technology like lemmy
minus-squareSquare Singerlinkfedilink23•10 months agodd if=/dev/random of=anarchism bs=1024 count=1024;chmod 755 anarchism;./anarchism
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-210 months agoThe output is not valid, it won’t do anything… maybe write to a file “anarchism” in the dir in which the terminal was opened.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoWell, not exactly. Anarchism is pretty close to what Socialism is, in terms of distributing labour.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•10 months agoAnarchists are just people who think Stalinism is communism and haven’t read Marx yet
Anyone know how I can program Anarchism?
Allow all code merges automatically
Anarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
Basicaly democracy on steroids
So we could use a blockchain… (/s)
But then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
You can have a majority vote system.
Which is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.
Is it not possible for the people to all agree to respect the result of the majority vote even if they voted against the motion?
Which requires a consensus.
An initial one.
Open a GitHub repo with a hello world script and accept each and every commit
The same way, generally. Work on decentralized, open source software. It’s modern Mutual Aid.
work on decentralized technology like lemmy
dd if=/dev/random of=anarchism bs=1024 count=1024;chmod 755 anarchism;./anarchism
Holy hell, I need to try this in a vm sometime!
The output is not valid, it won’t do anything… maybe write to a file “anarchism” in the dir in which the terminal was opened.
I think that emulates anarchism pretty well.
Well, not exactly. Anarchism is pretty close to what Socialism is, in terms of distributing labour.
Open a git repo.
Anarchists are just people who think Stalinism is communism and haven’t read Marx yet