I do that manually. In about 1 out of 10, what looks like tracking stuff is actually needed for the link to work. So I’d expect that copy without site tracking option to not work 100% of the time.
It might become the default a little later on, they want to make sure it works ok first as an experimental feature before pushing it as a default would be my guess.
Why wouldn’t this simply be default behavior, and then they could add a “Copy link with tracking” menu item?
I do that manually. In about 1 out of 10, what looks like tracking stuff is actually needed for the link to work. So I’d expect that copy without site tracking option to not work 100% of the time.
Probably just removes known tracking GET parameters like
utm_*. Just from a parameter name and content it is impossble to infer the use.It might become the default a little later on, they want to make sure it works ok first as an experimental feature before pushing it as a default would be my guess.
Hadn’t thought of that, and it makes sense. Thanks.