• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    77 months ago

    RDR2 was still phenomenal after getting the GTAO money. Rockstar can still make great single-player content when they want to.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      I agree. It’s just that this is the same series… Idk maybe it will kick ass, I’m just overly cynical I guess lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        My expectation is that it will be very good, but will have no single player DLC whatsoever in lieu of GTAO2 or whatever they call it. And no, I’ve never forgiven them for doing that with V. At least this time I won’t be expecting it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          What if it doesn’t need DLC? When the concept of DLC first came out, everyone complained that devs were just releasing unfinished games and that you were obligated to buy DLC to enjoy a full experience. Now people only buy games because they’re expecting DLC?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Because Rockstar did some good DLC for GTA IV and Red Dead Redemption. I agree that DLC isn’t a good thing if it’s carved out of the base game, but Rockstar had a good track record of making good DLC for already feature-complete games.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Did you even read my initial comment?

          I explicitly said that I have never been let down by a GTA campaign. What I was saying was that RDR2 is a different series that plays by different rules. For that reason I don’t feel like it’s necessarily fair to use RDR2 as an example of how they will treat GTA with the respect the series deserves.