minus-squareMacOPlink120•10 months agoTriggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink14•10 months agoLudicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.
Triggered due to incorrect handling of LaTeX. Original answer on the page was 10^80 which ended up getting the exponentiation ignored by google
Ludicrous. Nobody has the time to count 10^80 particles. You may think you’re fooling us, but I’m not having NONE of it.