• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      207 months ago

      It’s sad to say, but that generation of Ford Ranger is way smaller than trucks from the last decade.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        77 months ago

        I’ve never really been a truck guy, I also hate driving large vehicles in general and both preferences predate both my knowledge and even belief in climate change(I was raised as an evangelical in the south).

        If there was something like a Ranger or an S10 from the mid-late 90s with an electric motor I’d be all over it, fuck put out an electric El Camino and I’d rip my sleeves off on the way to the dealership

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          There’s kits to convert the old Rangers to electric I think and there was an electric model from the 90s sold only to Ford employees. You’re definitely going to drop a ton on batteries though if you were trying to convert one yourself

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          In the US at least, it’s the other way around. The Ford Ranger is 100% Ford, while Mazda actually rebadged the Ford Ranger as the B series for the US market.

    • TheaoneAndOnly27
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      Man, I tried finding one of those cool websites where you can put like two cars together to compare their size. But it doesn’t have the year of my ranger. But yeah, they’re smaller than the new trucks by a lot. And they weigh about half as much. If you can get one of the older Toyota’s or like a cool little Datsun, they’re a little bit smaller, but really kind of in the mid 2000s was when trucks really started blowing up in size and absurdity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        Have you seen a 2003 Ranger? They’re objectively small unless you are comparing them to a mini cooper or an 80s Miata.