@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 10 months agoknow the features of your languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up1647arrow-down124
arrow-up1623arrow-down1imageknow the features of your languagelemmy.world@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square147fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•10 months agoMost languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
Most languages that let you do ambiguous return types don’t do compile-time type checking, and vice versa. But if it’s actually implemented that way, then it’s logically equivalent, you’re right. Still, I prefer having things explicit
Yeah it’s nice to be able to see it