• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    347 months ago

    I am confused on why this cant work.

    Surely cutting down trees for wood can be profitable, otherwise capitalism wouldn’t be doing it.

    Is it so hard for a professional firm to also source their wood from urban areas to save a tree elsewhere?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      67 months ago

      Most companies in my neck of the woods (greater Seattle area) charge for cutting down the tree(s) AND keep the wood, unless you pay them more to keep it yourself or the wood is fairly worthless.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        57 months ago

        Also Greater Seattle Area. Friend had someone come out and verify a tree up the hill from his house was at high risk of falling onto the house. Some kind of maple.

        Got immediate approval to take it down from the city without all the usual permitting process.

        Quotes he got all included **paying extra **to haul the tree to the dump. He opted to keep it on his land so they left a bunch of rounds in piles around his house / driveway, and it took four of us a weekend to use a wood splitter and axes to chop into firewood (and even then we didn’t finish it all).

        I guess they just dump it because land is too expensive in the area to store it stacked to dry to be usable firewood. Not to mention the labor costs.