A couple months ago the findings against Hunter Biden were nothing, not even worth taking to court, only under GOP pressure did the Trump appointed prosecutor take it to court. Now it seems like a big deal and 17 years (max). What happened? Why the change? Was new evidence found?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    237 months ago

    That was excellent!

    Question about the back taxes. Why in the world would it be illegal to let someone else pay them and then reimburse them later?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      327 months ago

      It isn’t. The point is that accruing back taxes requires payment and may, at the discretion of the IRS, mandate a criminal charge. He wasn’t charge at the time because he paid, but he could have been. So now they want him to have been.

      However I think neither party really wants things to go this way, and Republicans are going to see lots of retaliatory investigation and charges brought over missed payments etc. should they pursue this.

      A waste of time and money, doesn’t improve anything in the world, just creates more division. Basically the GOP motto.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        Don’t think missing payments is illegal, they just fine you to hell and back, but it’s not criminal. From further reading I’m gathering there was some low-key fraud, and that they will nail you for.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          Accruing back taxes can happen for a lot of reasons, one of which would be deliberate under reporting, which if a form of fraud. Hence why the IRS has the latitude to recommend charges if they feel the actions were significant and deliberate.

          It’s important to remember that Trump’s current case he’s arguing he didn’t have the Mens Rea for deliberate fraud, so it’s weird to see GOP members discounting that argument as invalid with Biden.