• firecat
    link
    fedilink
    -3110 months ago

    Valve doesn’t want to support Apple computers for their own games. No, Valve is not better, the two companies CEOs are just jerks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2710 months ago

      They tried. Then apple dropped 32bit binaries support.

      Apple is a very expensive partner to have. They do whatever they want with their ecosystem and many developers have been burned when apple decides to make their work obsolete or outright copies it and makes part of the bundled in apps.

      So. It would be amazing if valve updated every one of their games for new versions of macOS and if they would kept MacOS proton support. But macOS is a moving target that will break backwards compatibility whenever it suits apple. So I understand that is hard to justify the investment.

      In the end MacOs and Linux where less than a 1% of the Steam user base. But one is an open ecosystem where there is competition and some semblance of respect for backwards compatibility and the other is a closed and sometimes hostile environment.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        In the end MacOs and Linux where less than a 1% of the Steam user base

        It’s very low, but to be precise, macOS is 1.53% and Linux is 1.91%, according to the November 2023 survey. Almost 3.5% between them.

        SteamOS is by far the largest Linux version, at 42.99% of Linux installs, followed by Arch at 7.81% and Ubuntu 22 at 6.67%.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          It’s getting bigger, but I said they WERE less than an 1%. And macOS was bigger that Linux for ages.

          Then Apple proved they were not an ideal alternative platform, being even more closed than Microsoft, and not understanding the games ecosystem, so Valve pivoted and got into the Linux thing, failed with the Steam Machines, pivoted into Proton, and now I have a Deck.

          • firecat
            link
            fedilink
            010 months ago

            Valve only source is not a legitimate source to prove anything. Valve is known to lied to everyone and everything.

        • firecat
          link
          fedilink
          010 months ago

          That’s ONLY according to Valve and has many court cases revealed, Valve has a history of lying.

          Valve lies about ownership of the game controller.

          Valve lied to AU to not get refunds to the people.

          Valve lied about VR funding.

          Valve lied to the EU government officials in GEO region lawsuit.

          Valve is not a trusted company and you should not trust sources based solely off Valve.

          • Zagorath
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            It’s certainly reasonable to be sceptical, but you should also ask yourself: what would be their motivation for lying here? What would they gain by saying there are 3.5% non-Windows users when there are actually less than 1%? Lying about funding and legal compliance has obvious motivation. And maybe there is some reason for lying about their platform usage breakdown too, but it’s certainly not as obvious.

            • firecat
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              People are just believing in the status. In the old days the sales numbers from individual businesses were the focus. Nowadays they are used as a console indicator for sales.

              Steam blocking people from accessing API sell means Valve can lie without proof.
              https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/steam-privacy-changes-block-steamspy

              If you play Genshin Impact, a false god was believed to be their god for years. Only it wasn’t their actual god. This is the same thing, Valve wants people to believe in the status and they want people to not question it.

              • Zagorath
                link
                fedilink
                English
                210 months ago

                Valve wants people to believe in the status and they want people to not question it

                But why would they want people to believe in the status of Mac being much higher than it is? Or Linux?

                • firecat
                  link
                  fedilink
                  110 months ago

                  There’s a thing where if you make it unbelievably easy to get caught, you will get caught. The numbers are just balanced so people won’t question it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        Not to mention having zero support for Vulkan or modern OGL, excepting compatibility layers on top of Metal (which is not an easy task) by third parties.

      • firecat
        link
        fedilink
        -210 months ago

        Steam also drop 32bits in their games. Again it’s a corporate problem not support or game related problems.

          • firecat
            link
            fedilink
            -510 months ago

            You do know Valve could have not use Chrome and just spent money to build it right. Don’t defend Valve for being cheap.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              510 months ago

              The technology used by Valve is Irrelevant. The operating system losing support is not even supported by apple. The users of that version of MacOs are at risk because they use a closed source unmantained operating system.

              As I said Apple is not concerned with kind of old software. They expect everyone to move up with them, developers and users, or get left behind.

              Portal is a game released THE SAME YEAR the iPhone was. In classic hit PC game time that’s “nothing”, you expect to be able to run it, but in Apple’s timeline is ancient history. Take a look into how many iPhone games just won’t work anymore.