• pan_troglodytes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    ah, that’s unfortunate. might be something they’ll want to work towards

    • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Without a doubt. I think (if high school memory serves me right) geothermal is one of the harder power gens just because of how much can go wrong/brittle the process is, but I’m not sure if that includes nuclear power in the mix.

      Arguably nuclear is one of the most powerful although it has plenty of drawbacks like waste disposal (as if we don’t already have an issue with this lmao)

      • pan_troglodytes
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        there’s good ways to store the nuclear waste but they’re not politically acceptable. easier to just let it pile up and make it someone else’s problem.

          • pan_troglodytes
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            well there’s glassifying it (encapsulating the waste in an obsidian/glass container), burying it deep, deep underground in a seismically neutral/void area, and the ever popular launching it into the Sun.

            • stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              How long does that obsidian glass container last?

              And would sending additional entropy to the sun really be without consequence?