@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 months agoWishing you guys a happy civil war 2lemmy.worldimagemessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1419arrow-down121
arrow-up1398arrow-down1imageWishing you guys a happy civil war 2lemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 months agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•edit-29 months ago That’s not how American courts work? Nope. The court of appeals can find fault with the methods, procedure, precedent etc but not the facts. (Also, that’s not how question marks work.)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•9 months agoBut here’s the thing: they could easily say the method that led to the finding is wrong. It’s not a fact.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-4•9 months agoIf it’s decided by the lower court it is held as fact. It may not in your opinion be correct but it is verifiably a fact at this point.
Nope. The court of appeals can find fault with the methods, procedure, precedent etc but not the facts.
(Also, that’s not how question marks work.)
But here’s the thing: they could easily say the method that led to the finding is wrong. It’s not a fact.
If it’s decided by the lower court it is held as fact. It may not in your opinion be correct but it is verifiably a fact at this point.