• FlumPHP
    link
    414 months ago

    It’s also disingenuous because they already decline to host sex workers newsletters. So if the censorship angle was true, they’re already censoring.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      14 months ago

      Right, and if the profit motive angle were true, they’re already violating that by censoring the sex workers you just mentioned.

      So that eliminates profit as the reason for their actions here