@lysdexicM to C++English • 9 months agoC++ Should Be C++www.open-std.orgmessage-square9arrow-up122arrow-down14
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkC++ Should Be C++www.open-std.org@lysdexicM to C++English • 9 months agomessage-square9
minus-square@MadhuGururajanlink3•edit-29 months agoMy point is that the design is wrong. Nobody expects [] as lvalue to update a value. Your argument is descriptive, mine is prespcriptive. I am saying that the C++ committee is wrong on this one (or whoever designed it this way)
My point is that the design is wrong. Nobody expects [] as lvalue to update a value. Your argument is descriptive, mine is prespcriptive. I am saying that the C++ committee is wrong on this one (or whoever designed it this way)