lysdexicM to C++English · 11 months agoC++ Should Be C++www.open-std.orgexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down14
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkC++ Should Be C++www.open-std.orglysdexicM to C++English · 11 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareMadhuGururajanlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-211 months agoMy point is that the design is wrong. Nobody expects [] as lvalue to update a value. Your argument is descriptive, mine is prespcriptive. I am saying that the C++ committee is wrong on this one (or whoever designed it this way)
My point is that the design is wrong. Nobody expects [] as lvalue to update a value. Your argument is descriptive, mine is prespcriptive. I am saying that the C++ committee is wrong on this one (or whoever designed it this way)