• @Lmaydev
    link
    12
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Congress can override an executive order. But the president can veto that action. But Congress can stop a veto with a 2/3s vote.

    So if they controlled 2/3s of Congress they could stop anything he tries to do.

    That actually seems pretty balanced.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -36 months ago

      My faith in lemmy users actually replying to facts and informative posts like this without some type of online emotional outburst or downvotes is pretty much nil at this point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        As a whole Lemmy users are deeply stupid or deeply ignorant or both. I think it’s an age thing, but I could be wrong. Most of what gets tossed around here as Lemmy’s received orthodoxy is pure amateur hour bullshit that has very little to do with reality.

        Another cause for this is that Lemmy’s userbase tends to be very ideologically driven as opposed to forming political views on the basis of evidence and solutions based rationality.

        Obviously I’m not very popular around here. Fortunately I don’t care. I’m just killing time and if I can shake even one person’s ill-founded convictions, I am happy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        Except it’s not true. Executive orders have no teeth. They’re not legislation so there’s no criminal or civil penalty for ignoring them. Which means legislation doesn’t need to do anything to override them. At most, the president can replace positions under his authority if the orders are not followed.

        • @Lmaydev
          link
          46 months ago

          The president can sanction states and companies that don’t follow them. So it’s a bit more than they can just be ignored.