• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -166 months ago

    If they have a problem with me doing that, they can nominate someone who represents my interests.

    Or just insult me, that’ll work wonders.

    • @Lmaydev
      link
      27
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Removed by mod

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -18
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Eh, it’s more about choosing to lose slowly vs. choosing to lose quickly.

        Either way we lose, which is what the lesser-evil means. At least with Trump winning, people might change their strategy to prevent similar wins in the future.

        Biden winning means that the lesser-evil is still in style and we have no reason to address the root of society’s problems.

        I’m sorry you need to resort to personal insults, but that just tells me you’re not confident about your point.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          166 months ago

          Accelerationism like that does not work. It makes things worse for everyone and nothing improves in the end.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          166 months ago

          Wen you elect fascists they don’t always allow free and fair elections in the future so this “similar wins int he future” clause is ignorant. Especially when the fascist in question already attempted one coup to stay in power when he lost an election.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            66 months ago

            voting for a fascist is voting against future elections… just giving power to those who must never, ever, have it.

        • @eksb
          link
          English
          10
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          If a third of registered Democrats stopped voting for DNC-backed candidates who do not represent them (by not voting or by voting for the Green Party candidate) and the Democrats lost in a landslide, the DNC would have two options:

          1. move left to regain the voters
          2. move right to keep the corporate bribes coming and try to sway Republican voters.

          I am not at all confident that they would select option 1.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Except that if Trump wins there wont be any voters to win since we won’t have elections anymore. What part about a dictatorship do you people not understand?

            • @Lmaydev
              link
              36 months ago

              Not everyone is staunchly one party or the other. The people in the middle are the main target for campaigning.

                • @Lmaydev
                  link
                  16 months ago

                  That’s just how it’s portrayed in the media.

                  Plenty of people will always vote one way ofc.

                  But just as many people swing based on how well the current government is doing. They are the voters you need to get on side.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -16 months ago

                    Uhh, no. That’s how most voters actually behave now.

                    Even if the government is doing better under opposition, they will pivot and move goalposts to justify voting for whichever tribe they’ve been voting for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 months ago

      Why? Do you often base your voting intentions on whether people are mean to you on the internet?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      You’re not about to change your mind anyway, so why not have some fun calling you out for what you are?