@JPDev to Programmer Humor • edit-26 months agoFitbit Clock Faceimagemessage-square143arrow-up11.39Karrow-down127
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Face@JPDev to Programmer Humor • edit-26 months agomessage-square143
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•6 months agoWatches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink30•6 months agoYeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•6 months agohonestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-5•6 months agoit’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•6 months agoIt’s a chunk of plastic on your wrist. It’s always going to be a bit tacky.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•6 months agoTrue but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.
Watches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
Yeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
it’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
It’s a chunk of plastic on your wrist. It’s always going to be a bit tacky.
True but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.