@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 months agoYouTubefile.coffeeimagemessage-square279fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down159
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imageYouTubefile.coffee@[email protected] to [email protected] • 9 months agomessage-square279fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•9 months agoCould you explain to me how “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” could be perceived as racketeering, let alone “textbook?”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•9 months agoThere’s “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” and there’s “intentionally sabotage the work/service provided in order to extract more profits.”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-29 months ago“The work or service provided for free?” If so what’s the difference? If you’re getting something for free you have no right to complain
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•9 months agoBut it’s not free, just because you aren’t paying in money doesn’t mean you aren’t paying for it in other ways.
Could you explain to me how “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” could be perceived as racketeering, let alone “textbook?”
There’s “if someone wants to use my work, they should pay me for it” and there’s “intentionally sabotage the work/service provided in order to extract more profits.”
“The work or service provided for free?” If so what’s the difference? If you’re getting something for free you have no right to complain
But it’s not free, just because you aren’t paying in money doesn’t mean you aren’t paying for it in other ways.