petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoToolbx now offers built-in support for Arch Linux and Ubuntudebarshiray.wordpress.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up159arrow-down12
arrow-up157arrow-down1external-linkToolbx now offers built-in support for Arch Linux and Ubuntudebarshiray.wordpress.competsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squaresecanalinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoAny advantages over distrobox? Sounds very similar.
minus-squarerichardisaguy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoToolbox is more stable, but distrobox has more features
minus-squarebeta_tester@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoI’d use toolbx for server and distrobox for desktop.
minus-squareAlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoToolbx and Distrobox are basically identical. The only difference is Distrobox is more agnostic and will create .desktop files for containers and applications installed in them automatically. Toolbx you need to make the .desktop manually.
Any advantages over distrobox? Sounds very similar.
Toolbox is more stable, but distrobox has more features
I’d use toolbx for server and distrobox for desktop.
Toolbx and Distrobox are basically identical.
The only difference is Distrobox is more agnostic and will create .desktop files for containers and applications installed in them automatically. Toolbx you need to make the .desktop manually.