petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 年前Toolbx now offers built-in support for Arch Linux and Ubuntudebarshiray.wordpress.comexternal-linkmessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up159arrow-down12
arrow-up157arrow-down1external-linkToolbx now offers built-in support for Arch Linux and Ubuntudebarshiray.wordpress.competsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 年前message-square5linkfedilink
minus-squareRichard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 年前Toolbox is more stable, but distrobox has more features
minus-squarebeta_tester@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 年前I’d use toolbx for server and distrobox for desktop.
minus-squareAlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 年前Toolbx and Distrobox are basically identical. The only difference is Distrobox is more agnostic and will create .desktop files for containers and applications installed in them automatically. Toolbx you need to make the .desktop manually.
Any advantages over distrobox? Sounds very similar.
Toolbox is more stable, but distrobox has more features
I’d use toolbx for server and distrobox for desktop.
Toolbx and Distrobox are basically identical.
The only difference is Distrobox is more agnostic and will create .desktop files for containers and applications installed in them automatically. Toolbx you need to make the .desktop manually.