With a runup in home values sparking higher property taxes for many Georgia homeowners, there is a groundswell among state lawmakers in this election year to provide relief.

Georgia’s Senate Finance Committee plans a hearing on Monday on a bill limiting increases in a home’s value, as assessed for property tax purposes, to 3% per year. The limit would last as long as the owner maintained a homestead exemption. Voters would have to approve the plan in a November referendum.

Meanwhile, Republican House Speaker Jon Burns of Newington proposes doubling the state’s homestead tax exemption, a measure likely to cut tax bills by nearly $100 million statewide.

    • Zikeji
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I bought my house back in 2021, and despite no renovations for myself or my neighborhood the property tax I’ve paid had gone up by just under 25% each year these last two years. I haven’t checked the change in assessed value but I think this bill would make it sting less lol

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Reminder: not everyone living in homes that grew in value can afford to sell their house and move.

      not everyone… can afford to sell their house and move.

      not everyone… can afford to sell their house

      Maybe it’s because I’m a lowly rentoid and don’t understand these complex, home-owner things, but the rest of us have to ‘live within our means’, and don’t even get reimbursed for it by selling a piece of property significantly above what we paid for it when we get priced out of an area.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Those who own a house can have our budget changed by things outside of our control. If my neighbor builds a mansion that makes my house more valueable and thus worth more and so I have to pay more taxes - nothing has changed about my house though. This means I have less money in my budget to do my own remodeling, go on vacation or whatever.

        I know as a homeowner I will have expenses, but most are somewhat predictable - I replaced my furnace this fall but I started budgeting for it 2 years ago. My roof is getting old and so I’m already starting to budget for replacing it. However if my house goes up in value by more than inflation that is hard to budget for.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Those who own a house can have our budget changed by things outside of our control. If my neighbor builds a mansion that makes my house more valueable and thus worth more and so I have to pay more taxes - nothing has changed about my house though. This means I have less money in my budget to do my own remodeling, go on vacation or whatever.

          … okay? Join the rest of us? Do you think that doesn’t happen to people who don’t own homes? The only difference is that we don’t own the property, and thus we not only pay more, but we have no equity gain from it in addition.

          • bluGill@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It is easier to move if you rent (it still isn’t easy). In fact if you rent the ease of moving is one way to control rent increases. One consideration on the rent vs buy choice is do you want to stay in the same place for many more years. The advantages of buying generally only happen after 5-10 years in the same location. Thus I expect this to hurt owners more than renters because I expect renters to move more often anyway.

            The above is in general. I know renters who have been in the same place for years, that is okay so long as your landlord isn’t taking advantage of you. I know homeowners who move every couple years - though I’m not sure I’d call that a good decision.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                Communism is not a poverty cult. You’re just describing crabs dragging each other back into the bucket.

                We should be housing everyone, not dropping more people into the rental market to be exploited by landlords.

                Instead of just raising taxes evenly, tax the fuck out of landlords and real estate investors. They’re the problem.

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Communism is not a poverty cult. You’re just describing crabs dragging each other back into the bucket.

                  “Poverty cult is when you suggest people who own a literal million dollars worth of property should pay taxes that equate to less than the most bottom-of-the-barrel studio apartment”

                  Critical support for rugged individualism, huh?

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    “Join the rest of us” is, in fact, a poverty cult. You’re demanding that people who have been priced out of their homes be thrown to the wolves like we have been. I don’t want more people to be victimized by landlords. The goal isn’t to drag lucky people into the mud with the rest of us and fight over scraps. The goal is to target the people who are causing the problem and remove them from society.

                    That’s landlords and real estate investors. They’re the ones driving up costs and they’re the ones exploiting people without property. A home owner losing their home because prices rose in their area due to gentrification is just the crabs dragging them back into the bucket.