• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    215 months ago

    To be fair that’s not limited to Apple. Any company will follow the law to the letter, and lobby to change the law in their favour.

    • Mario_Dies.wav
      link
      fedilink
      English
      205 months ago

      Ok, but Android wouldn’t have to allow sideloading by that logic, yet…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        125 months ago

        Android is not a company though, it’s FOSS. Google could ban it on their branch I suppose.

        • Mario_Dies.wav
          link
          fedilink
          English
          135 months ago

          True. I have a Samsung, which does do some shitty ass things like remove the option to turn off data access to apps, but even they allow “sideloading” (I don’t even like that term – it’s just installing software in the normal way to me)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          25 months ago

          Most Android components can technically be FOSS, but the it’s monolythic nature makes it very hard to get from those FOSS benefits. Best example is TV using Android, phone using Android, but cannot change the interface without hacking half-baked thing like custom ROM.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        105 months ago

        Google does indeed use Google Play Services to gate-keep the Ecosystem while keeping Android technically FOSS. Still better than Apple in this case, but hey… would you rather be hanged or beheaded?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            45 months ago

            No but many of them. Play Services gets more and more functions that used to be part of the Android operating system. Some very basic functionalities are assisted GPS or Push notifications.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        So? Companies can and have removed features like that at the behest of some dickwad in power. Don’t take anything for granted. We need to heavily regulate them. Or hell take games. Capcom is currently adding DRM to 12+year old games. Garbage like that should be forbidden by law instead of relying on shitstorms to get companies to comply.

        • Mario_Dies.wav
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          I’m not taking it for granted. It was just an observation of fact.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      Despite not being forced by governments, no android phone uses a shitty proprietary charger port, nor have they ever. And last night I discovered side loading is possible on my fucking google TV device. Again, no laws require this, it’s just called not being a fucking prick.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Not always. Consumers given choice they should go for the product that is best. That way companies have to make the best product. That’s competition working.

      Like when ps3 offered free online but xbox didn’t. That killed the xbox market as everyone could choose a similar product that was cheaper.

      Or when apple forced everyone to use their products people went to the Samsung because you could do what you want. That killed apple.

      Or when some companies offered subscription model like Microsoft Office, everyone went to alternatives and that killed Microsoft Office.

      Honestly I blame people. We had all the information and just laughed in the face of reason. We are choosing to spend more for a shittier product.