• guyrocket
    link
    fedilink
    135 months ago

    I was very aware of this “sharing” of footage when I bought my camera system and intentionally did not buy ring and other brands because I want to own that video. I went so far as to not connect my system to the internet which gives me less options (i.e. see it on my phone anytime) but sometimes privacy comes with a price.

      • guyrocket
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        You mean running my own VPN phone to house, right? Not a paid VPN.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          85 months ago

          Yup, a simple Wireguard setup would work fine.

          I also like Tailscale, but unless you’re running it with Headscale, then technically they hold the keys.

          • capital
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 months ago

            WireGuard server running on OpenWRT is 👌🏼

    • Monkey With A Shell
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      Are they still accessable from the local net, preferably with some auth even without the internet feed? That sounds like a pretty ideal thing to me. Recording and motion ssense starting…

      Really what I want is a simple cam that can dump a circular buffer to the NAS via a NFS/smb share and local net live view. Seems simple but yet rare.

      • Saik0
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 months ago

        Frigate + HASS.

        All my cameras are accessed with Frigate, which stores everything on a NAS (400TB…). Since I can mount up a coral.ai I can do object detection and throw away the frames/recordings that have literally nothing going on. HASS fronts the whole UI for myself and my other users(wife/kids). Cameras don’t have access to the internet at all… Local access is sufficient to get it into the interfaces that I need it in.