@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-28 months agoseamless seekinglemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1633arrow-down123file-text
arrow-up1610arrow-down1imageseamless seekinglemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-28 months agomessage-square77fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink15•8 months agoIt’s possible that it’s a logarithmic scale.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•8 months agoit’s a double log… y = log(log(x))… or maybe *graph not to scale
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 months agoThat would make way more sense when you’re talking about relative speeds of the speed of light and pretty much anything else.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoThey used the Windows 95 Microsoft progress bar code
Removed by mod
It’s possible that it’s a logarithmic scale.
Removed by mod
it’s a double log… y = log(log(x))…
or maybe *graph not to scale
That would make way more sense when you’re talking about relative speeds of the speed of light and pretty much anything else.
They used the Windows 95 Microsoft progress bar code