@[email protected] to [email protected] • 8 months agozodiac signlemmy.mlimagemessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up11.46Karrow-down172 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.38Karrow-down1imagezodiac signlemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected] • 8 months agomessage-square122fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•8 months agoSo not at all based in science? Interesting as a historical curiosity but nothing more?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•8 months agoInteresting because of the psychological insights into not how all people are, but how people make up theories in general. Same way religion has scientific significance in an anthropological sense.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 months agoPerhaps “historical curiosity” was a little obtuse of me.
So not at all based in science? Interesting as a historical curiosity but nothing more?
Interesting because of the psychological insights into not how all people are, but how people make up theories in general. Same way religion has scientific significance in an anthropological sense.
Perhaps “historical curiosity” was a little obtuse of me.