• MagicShel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    My wife’s company got bought out by an ESOP company. When she explained it to me, the whole thing sounded like a scam. I’m not qualified to explain it but it sounds like the stock never vests until you retire so no one has any control outside of the incompetent execs who run the thing.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah… and a lot of companies use this to replace your 401k or in lieu of contributing to one. So, a big chunk of your retirement savings is tied up in the company and usually can’t be diversified until you’re pretty close to retirement age.

      Alternatively, if you leave the company, many will let you take money out and roll it into an IRA, but it’s usually capped at like $5k per year. It can take a long time to get your money out.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s not necessarily a feature of ESOP.

      My first ESOP vested 100% on day 1, we also had a 401k with matching, with a discretionary amount added from the company depending on how well the company did that year (never saw less than 10% of my salary in the years I was there). If/when you leave the company, you’re payed out within 3 years.

      For my second ESOP it was a 3 year vesting schedule, no 401k matching and no discretionary amount (though ESOP contribution was ~10% of salary, depending on company performance). If/when you leave the company, you’re payed out starting at year 6, over a period of a few years (can’t remember exactly).

      I say all this to demonstrate that these things can be set up very differently while all still being an ESOP generally.

      • MagicShel
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah, and basically my point was that ESOP doesn’t mean you can’t fuck over the employees. I’m sure some versions of it are really good, but until no versions of it suck, it’s hard to say it’s necessarily better.

        It certainly is a step in the right direction, but it still allows some really shitty structures.

        That said, good post and good examples.