Did your Roku TV decide to strong arm you into giving up your rights or lose your FULLY FUNCTIONING WORKING TV? Because mine did.

It doesn’t matter if you only use it as a dumb panel for an Apple TV, Fire stick, or just to play your gaming console. You either agree or get bent.

  • sebinspace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    694 months ago

    In my experience, people that use the phrase “you’re part of the problem” so loosely are often the most miserable jackasses anyone ever allowed into society.

    People just want neat things. It’s not wrong to want neat things.

    • @namingthingsiseasy
      link
      English
      194 months ago

      It’s not wrong, but it’s just terribly short-sighted. You’re giving greed-crazed companies total control over a device that you own and nobody else should be able to touch.

      Shiny things come at a cost. Sure, it may look convenient and super cool to have all these features, but it’s important to understand the trade-offs. And this is just the tip of the iceberg - we don’t even know what kinds of malice these companies will think of 5-10 years from now when these machines are even more widespread and probably come with even more invasive anti-user hardware capabilities.

      It’s not wrong… it’s just very very naïve.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Most people don’t get that this is even possible until it bites them in the ass like this.

        Certainly my own parents wouldn’t think to try and find a “dumb” TV in this market or to not connect the damn thing to the internet like it tells you when you power it on. They bought a TV that lets them watch Netflix.

        By the same token, I don’t except my fucking microwave to suddenly require that I accept a ToS in order to nuke a potato, or to suddenly start showing me ads in increasing amounts a year or more after I bought and paid for it.

        Users aren’t the problem. Shitty companies and a lack of strong legislation against this (or legislators being for it) are the problem. Nobody should ever be presented with a 50 page ever-changing EULA for a product they’ve paid for to access common functionality.

        They’re not a problem. They’re not even naive. They’re just not savvy on all things about a given technology especially when it comes up aspects of legal arguments on such.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -5
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        No ones asking you to stick some shiny thing up your ass and walk around to see how it fits. If you don’t like these services don’t use them, for most of us the convinience of an Internet connected device that let’s you stream content published to the Internet is a value.

        • Bahnd Rollard
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          The issue is that the market has spoken. People want cool neat things and they want them cheap. Companies were able to lower the price of major devices by including all the always-online stuff as it generated revenue after the initial purchase.

          Now everything comes with smart shit wether you want it or not, and for those that dont, the product they wish to have dosent exist or is more expensive. So… the argument that the “naiveity” of the masses is making things worse is valid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      04 months ago

      I agree. That was why I originally bought the damned thing. Once I saw what it was doing on my network I decided “nope, that’s enough from you” and reset it. I’m not saying people who also bought it and continue to use it as intended are dumb, I’m suggesting the device itself and what it does is evil.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -94 months ago

      It’s not wrong to think people are stupid for wanting pointlessly internet connected things either.

      • Vit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        314 months ago

        Well sure, but we’re not talking about a washing machine or a refrigerator. Currently most media we watch is over the internet, so I at least don’t consider a TV with an internet connection “pointlessly” online.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -134 months ago

          Okay, well you are free to enjoy having your device bricked whenever the company you bought it from wants to.

          • Vit
            link
            fedilink
            English
            124 months ago

            And that’s incredibly unfortunate. Make no mistake, I’m not arguing in favor of the companies here. I was merely pointing out that TVs are not one of the impractical “smart” devices, which I believe you implied. There’s plenty of good use cases for an internet connected TV, and I don’t think users are stupid for wanting one. I too wish that we could have nice things not be ruined by corporate greed. That’s all. Have a good day.

      • sebinspace
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -174 months ago

        Man, you are one angry fucker… You ever try weed?

        • ArxCyberwolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          134 months ago

          Weed doesn’t magically make you less hostile of a person. If that were the case Canada would be a hell of a lot better than it is now, and it isn’t.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          104 months ago

          I do smoke, wierdly enough it doesn’t make me not care about privacy and practicality.