• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think here the point is that the US government seems to be not bothered by Meta’s data collection which by the way has already been used by Cambridge Analytica to swing elections in favour of one of the opponents and most likely used on countless more occasions but it is now super worried about Tiktok.

        And what did they do against Meta? To the best of my knowledge nothing effective.

        If they do this they should apply the same measures against Meta and other companies but they don’t. Which is disturbing.

        Same with Gaza and Israel. Hamas kills around less than 1 K civilians (mind you a lot of the killed on that first day were military), it is utter tragedy. Israel kills 30+K people, starves the local population, destroys almost completely the infrastructure and their homes and it is business as usual. And every now and then they are scorned to please their voting base while weapon sales to Israel are continuing. Replace Israel with Russia/NK/China or any other country the US considers hostile and they will have them sanctioned to hell, but since it is Israel, nothing of this is happening.

        At least have the fucking decency not to have double standards, because the rest of the world isn’t blind or stupid.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          134 months ago

          As I recall they got Zuckerberg on stand and did their best “rabble rablle rabble” at him, with a few decent questions mixed in, then nothing.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 months ago

              Good to hear! Love it when a megacorp gets the screws now and again, wish it happened more frequently (specifically to ISPs who took government funds for fiber infrastructure)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 months ago

          Yes, you have pointed out the subtext that was there all along and pretended like it’s some new argument.

          It is about the data sharing. The US doesn’t like companies sharing data with countries that it views as its geopolitical rivals. Big surprise, am I right?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            94 months ago

            Seriously. Don’t cover your eyes and pretend you can’t see why the government treats US companies different than companies that are directly in the hands of adversaries. They might not care if Meta uses it to profit off of us, but they certainly do care if China will use it to achieve an advantage over us, militarily or otherwise.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          384 months ago

          I can’t order Jimmy John’s on my work computer anymore. Why? Because tiktok is blocked on our work network. What does tiktok have to do with Jimmy John’s? Well I would have thought nothing expect it won’t let you set your delivery option unless it’s allowed to send data to analytics.tiktok.com.

          Why is a God damn sandwich shop sending my location to tiktok? No idea, but it’s definitely not just the video app that’s the problem.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          274 months ago

          I dunno what hill you’re trying to die on here. A stupid dancing app that provides a data collection platform by a foreign surveillance state is a plot on the Orville. Nobody is concerned with it competing with Google, Apple orYouTube. It’s so off-base. Google sucks anyway. If people are searching on TikTok it’s because it’s giving better results for them than Google. It’s about who is collecting the data.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              84 months ago

              No, I think it sets a bad precedent. I don’t think TikTok should be allowed in the US (if the US decides it doesn’t want it as they’re seeming to). Taking the property is going to cause a bunch of what you mentioned.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              114 months ago

              Isn’t this in some way the same as how China bans a number of foreign companies from operating? I don’t think doing the exact same thing is entirely fair but when others aren’t playing by the same rules, it’s a lot less black and white.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      174 months ago

      I’m surprised that people are surprised that a country would favor it’s own businesses versus foreign ones.

      I’m also unsure of which countries act differently from this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        I’m not surprised but I’m still outraged at the amount of hypocrisy they are pulling off out of this one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      Ah yes, the US, where no foreign company is allowed to be successful.

      Such unsuccessful or banned foreign companies include Samsung, LG, Sony, Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Aldi, Shell, Siemens…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14 months ago

      And if foreign politics won’t take care of it call the CIA and tell it they’re hiding oil under the presidents house.