U.S. Rep. Katie Porter became a social media celebrity by brandishing a white board at congressional hearings to dissect CEOs and break down complex figures into assaults on corporate greed, a signature image that propelled the Democrat’s U.S. Senate candidacy in California.

The progressive favorite known for spotlighting her soccer mom, minivan-driving home life was trounced in Tuesday’s primary election to fill the seat once held by the late Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein, finishing far behind Republican Steve Garvey and fellow Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff.

Porter didn’t go down quietly. She immediately pointed a finger at “billionaires spending millions to rig this election.” That claim resulted in a brutal social media backlash from many who were happy to depict the congresswoman as a graceless loser.

Perhaps chastened by the criticism, Porter later clarified her initial statement to say she didn’t believe the California vote count or election process had been compromised, but she didn’t recant her earlier remarks. Rigged, she said in a follow-up, “means manipulated by dishonest means.”

  • Tja
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    How do you define manipulate VS convince?

      • Tja
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Were there any lies spread in this case then?

          • Tja
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            In the context of someone being accused of manipulation to win an election. If they lied it could be, if not maybe they just had a better message.